Re: Elmer and Don Quiote ponder ERT
Reply to: comm-666173902@craigslist.org
Date: 2008-05-03, 11:18AM CDT
"I regret what has happened on CL-Milwaukee politics. I was once dubbed the
identity 'that was destroying CL-Milwaukee political post.' Frankly, I'd say
that title belongs to you, ERT. I cannot blame ESQ or Me Me for not posting
here much anymore. ...I don't know if ESQ or MeMe have found ERT too caustic
and obnoxious (and too much trouble) to bother with."
I remember when you received that title - do you recall that you were being
flagged off here, and someone wrote 'An Appeal regarding Elmer' which pled
that your posts should not be flagged? I wrote that Appeal. That was back
in the day, November 2007 to be exact, that we were the only two posting in
this section - we had a rather lengthy discussion about the writings found
in "Eusebius' History of the Church, from Christ to Constantine." Also, we
had a rather heated (and thanks to your replys, colorful) argument about the
4th chapter of the book of Ezekiel.
ESQ then entered the picture. I think I recall that he was interested in our
theological arguments. You apparently have forgotten that Chris announced
the 'soon to be' birth of their infant - and saying that life was too busy to
post much, here. (Though I suspect the real reason ESQ has disappeared is
because of the embarrassing revelations that Obama is the monster that I
said he was all along.)
As for MeMe - she is a troll (I highly suspect that she was the one that was
organizing the 'flag fest' against your posts, here). She is currently troll-
ing on the Milwaukee RnR section. If you miss her that much, why not go there
and say hello.
I should also let you know that I did not post "Book Smear Exposed." Unlike
you, I'm against the death penalty - that's because I don't want the govern-
ment to have authority to kill any human being. I don't trust government that
much. (Hey, who is the 'true conservative' here, anyway?)
I have just gotten a new book called, "The Brother of Jesus." I have only had
time to read the introduction, but the author is examining all know writings
of the early church, with regard to James (author of the Epistle of James.)
The author's thesis is that James, not Peter or Paul, was the real 'first
Bishop' of the early church. I think I'm going to be in for some excellent
reading and I am excited about another perspective into the early development
of the church.
So don't feel bad about this section - it had quite a run during the Wisconsin
Primary, and it is now dying back down to the dead section that it always was.
(It is the same in all cities, BTW. Most people post their political stuff in
the RnR section.)
Anyway - you see, you have it all wrong about me. I do not post to troll, but
to provoke thought. My goal is to smash taboos that are destroying our city
and nation. As you seem unwilling to examine your foolish beliefs about the
blacks that are destroying our city, shall I switch to attacking your hereti-
cal theological beliefs? ERT
- it's NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests
PostingID: 666173902